Beta
You are viewing a draft
Not for citation.

Socrates of Constantinople, Church History 1.8.41-1.8.45

   https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/474

Context

Socrates of Constantinople, the “Scholastic,” was an otherwise unknown historian of the early 5th century. He wrote his account of the Church from 305 to 439 to continue Eusebius of Caesarea, adopting a particular perspective on the relationship between Imperial and ecclesiastical authority. In this passage, Socrates describes the difficult position of Eusebius bishop of Caesarea at the Council of Nicaea in the summer of 325 C.E., where he was slow to accept the principle of consubstantiality. In June of 325, Eusebius wrote a long letter of explanation to his congregation at Caesarea, which Socrates quotes in full (Church History 1.8.35-1.8.54). In the second section of the letter, Eusebius writes that the emperor Constantine approved of the first draft of the Nicene Creed but exhorted the bishops to add the word consubstantial (ὁμοούσιος) to the second draft.

Text

(41) Ταύτης ὑφ’ ἡμῶν ἐκτεθείσης τῆς πίστεως οὐδενὶ παρῆν ἀντιλογίας τόπος, ἀλλ’ αὐτός τε πρῶτος ὁ θεοφιλέστατος ἡμῶν βασιλεὺς ὀρθότατα περιέχειν αὐτὴν ἐμαρτύρησεν, οὕτω τε καὶ ἑαυτὸν φρονεῖν συνωμολόγησεν καὶ ταύτῃ τοὺς πάντας συγκαταθέσθαι καὶ ὑπογράφειν τοῖς δόγμασιν καὶ συμφωνεῖν τούτοις αὐτοῖς παρεκελεύετο, ἑνὸς μόνου προσεγγραφέντος ῥήματος τοῦ ὁμοουσίου, (42) ὃ καὶ αὐτὸ ἑρμήνευε λέγων, ὅτι μὴ κατὰ τὰ τῶν σωμάτων πάθη λέγοιτο ὁμοούσιον, οὔτε κατὰ διαίρεσιν οὔτε κατά τινα ἀποτομὴν ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς ὑποστῆναι· μήτε γὰρ δύνασθαι τὴν ἄϋλον καὶ νοερὰν καὶ ἀσώματον φύσιν σωματικόν τι πάθος ὑφίστασθαι, θείοις δὲ καὶ ἀπορρήτοις λόγοις προσήκειν τὰ τοιαῦτα νοεῖν. (43) Καὶ ὁ μὲν σοφώτατος ἡμῶν καὶ εὐσεβέστατος βασιλεὺς τοιαῦτα ἐφιλοσόφει, οἱ δὲ προφάσει τῆς τοῦ ὁμοουσίου προσθήκης τήνδε τὴν γραφὴν πεποιήκασιν·(44) ‘Πιστεύομεν εἰς ἕνα Θεὸν πατέρα παντοκράτορα, πάντων ὁρατῶν τε καὶ ἀοράτων ποιητήν, καὶ εἰς ἕνα κύριον Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ θεοῦ, γεννηθέντα ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς μονογενῆ, τουτέστιν ἐκ τῆς οὐσίας τοῦ πατρός, θεὸν ἐκ θεοῦ, φῶς ἐκ φωτός, θεὸν ἀληθινὸν ἐκ θεοῦ ἀληθινοῦ, γεννηθέντα, οὐ ποιηθέντα, ὁμοούσιον τῷ πατρί, δι’ οὗ τὰ πάντα ἐγένετο τά τε ἐν οὐρανῷ καὶ τὰ ἐν τῇ γῇ, τὸν δι’ ἡμᾶς τοὺς ἀνθρώπους καὶ διὰ τὴν ἡμετέραν σωτηρίαν κατελθόντα καὶ σαρκωθέντα, ἐνανθρωπήσαντα, παθόντα καὶ ἀναστάντα τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ, ἀνελθόντα εἰς οὐρανούς, ἐρχόμενον κρῖναι ζῶντας καὶ νεκρούς, καὶ εἰς τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα. (45) Τοὺς δὲ λέγοντας ‘ἦν ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν’ καὶ ‘πρὶν γεννηθῆναι οὐκ ἦν’ καὶ ὅτι ‘ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων ἐγένετο’ ἢ ἐξ ἑτέρας ὑποστάσεως ἢ οὐσίας φάσκοντας εἶναι ἢ κτιστὸν ἢ τρεπτὸν ἢ ἀλλοιωτὸν τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ θεοῦ, τούτους ἀναθεματίζει ἡ ἁγία τοῦ Θεοῦ καθολικὴ καὶ ἀποστολικὴ ἐκκλησία.’1

Textual Note

Ed. Hussey and Bright 1893 with ref. to Hansen 1995

Translation

(41) “When we had put forth this declaration of faith, no one had grounds to voice opposition, but our most-loved-by-God emperor [Constantine I] himself was the first to attest that it was perfectly correct. He declared that he himself agreed with the thinking, and he exhorted everyone to assent and to subscribe to these teachings and to support them in unison, with the addition of one single word, consubstantial. (42) The emperor explained this word by saying that (the Son) is said to be consubstantial not with respect to afflictions of the body, and that neither by dividing nor by any cutting off from the Father does (the Son) subsist; for (Constantine said that) a nature that is immaterial, intellectual, and incorporeal cannot be subjected to afflictions of the body, and that divine and ineffable terminology befits our conception of such matters. (43) Such was the philosophical view expressed by our wisest and most pious emperor. So (the bishops) produced the following text allegedly (to add) the consubstantial:(44) “We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ the son of God, begotten of God the only-born, that is, of the substance of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, true God from true God, born not made, consubstantial with the Father, through whom all things were made both in heaven and on earth, who for us humanity and for our salvation descended and became flesh, took the form of man, suffered, and arose on the third day, ascended to heaven, and will come to judge the living and the dead; and in the Holy Spirit. (45) Those who say ‘There was once when he was not,’ and ‘Before being born he was not,’ and ‘He became out of the non-existent,’ or claiming that he was from another substance or essence, or that the Son of God is created, changed, and altered, the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them.’ 2

Translation Note

Adapted from Zenos 1890 and Périchon and Maraval 2004-2007

Discussion Note

The quotations in §45 were phrases commonly associated with Arianism.

Works Cited

  • 1 Socrates of Constantinople, Ecclesiastical History, According to the Text of Hussey, ed. Robert Hussey and William Bright, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1893), bk: 1, ch: 8.41-8.45.Link to Zotero Bibliographic RecordLink to HathiTrust Bibliographic record
  • 2 Socrates of Constantinople, Socrates: Church History from A.D. 305-439, in Socrates, Sozomenus: Church Histories., trans. Andrew C Zenos, repr. of American ed., A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Churhc. Second Series 2 (New York: Christian Literature Publishing, 1890), 1–178, p: 11.Link to Zotero Bibliographic RecordLink to Worldcat Bibliographic record

Additional Bibliography

  • Socrates of Constantinople, Kirchengeschichte, ed. Günther Christian Hansen, Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrhunderte n.F. 1 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), bk: 1, ch: 8.41-8.45.Link to Zotero Bibliographic Record
  • Socrates of Constantinople, Socrate de Constantinople: Histoire ecclésiastique, trans. Pierre Périchon and Pierre Maraval, 4 vols., Sources chrétiennes 477, 493, 505, 506 (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2004), vol: 1, p: 106-109.Link to Zotero Bibliographic Record

How to Cite This Entry

Joseph L. Rife, “Socrates of Constantinople, Church History 1.8.41-1.8.45,” in Caesarea Maritima: A Collection of Testimonia, entry published June 30, 2023, https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/474.

Bibliography:

Joseph L. Rife, “Socrates of Constantinople, Church History 1.8.41-1.8.45.” In Caesarea Maritima: A Collection of Testimonia, edited by Joseph L. Rife., edited by Joseph L. Rife. Caesarea City and Port Exploration Project, 2023. Entry published June 30, 2023. https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/474.

About this Entry

Entry Title: Socrates of Constantinople, Church History 1.8.41-1.8.45

Authorial and Editorial Responsibility:

  • Joseph L. Rife, general editor, Vanderbilt University
  • Joseph L. Rife, editor, Caesarea Maritima: A Collection of Testimonia
  • David A. Michelson, Daniel L. Schwartz, and William L. Potter, technical editor, “Socrates of Constantinople, Church History 1.8.41-1.8.45
  • Joseph L. Rife, entry contributor, “Socrates of Constantinople, Church History 1.8.41-1.8.45

Additional Credit:

  • Testimonium edited by Joseph L. Rife
  • TEI record created by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium translated by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium transcribed by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium identified by Joseph L. Rife
  • Editorial review by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium edited by Joseph L. Rife
  • TEI record created by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium translated by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium transcribed by Joseph L. Rife
  • Testimonium identified by Joseph L. Rife
  • Editorial review by Joseph L. Rife
Show full citation information...